Documenting the link between Administrator "Crust" and Banned Scammers
This report presents evidence utilizing public data repositories, SteamRep archives, and IP correlation suggesting that current LiquidTF administrator Crust (SteamID: 76561199073805105) is an alternate account of the SteamRep-banned user Chris (SteamID: 76561198075654674).
Note: Crust has publicly revealed his real name to be Christopher previously, aligning with the Chris alias.
Publicly available logs definitively link the physical location (IP Address) of the current administrator "Crust" to the banned profile "Chris".
On Skial forums, user "Crust" (SteamID matches the LiquidTF admin) was logged with the IP address: 73.156.166.94. This logs the user in Florida, a location Crust has publicly claimed as his residence.
Intelligence X and Pastebin data show the SteamRep banned account 76561198075654674 connecting from the exact same residential IP address: 73.156.166.94.
Conclusion: Two separate Steam accounts, one currently administering LiquidTF, one banned for scamming, accessed Steam services from the same distinct residential IP address.
The creation of the current identity aligns perfectly with the "death" of the banned identity.
| Event | Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Banned Account "Chris" | July 13/14, 2020 | Account is set to Private and ceases main activity (Information sourced from Backpack.tf) |
| Current Admin "Crust" | July 13, 2020 | Steam Account 76561199073805105 is Created. |
Furthermore, the banned account "Chris" possesses a recorded alt account (76561198220694164) that is currently banned on Backpack.tf.
Despite claims by LiquidTF ownership that archives do not exist, the Internet Archive (Wayback Machine) clearly preserves the ban history of the original account.
Above: The preserved SteamRep profile for the account linked to Crust's IP, showing a "Banned" status.
The following is the truncated email exchange regarding this issue. Note the owner's shift from dismissal to legal threats when confronted with verification methods.
Sent to Vytal (LiquidTF) regarding the discovery.
Vytal responds, claiming the evidence is unverified and threatening legal action.
I replied offering paid access to IntelX investigation tools to verify the IP logs and pointed out the misinterpretation of the ban status.
No further communication has been received from Vytal or LiquidTF legal since this message.
The evidence suggests a high probability that the administration of LiquidTF includes an individual circumventing previous community bans. The refusal of ownership to investigate validated IP matches, combined with immediate legal posturing, raises significant concerns for the safety and transparency of the LiquidTF trading environment.
© 2026 Greg D. Estepp